There are so many conspiracy theories surrounding 9/11 now, thats it’s difficult to know which one to choose with so many on offer. I know the title of this article may sound crazy, but I genuinely believe that this is the most plausible explanation as to what happened at the world trade centres on 9/11 with all the evidence available….
Did Planes Hit The Twin Towers? Let’s find out…
I think we can almost all agree that the “planes” that hit the Twin Towers on that day were not the sole cause of the towers collapsing, this is not only scientifically impossible, but on every level illogical. There is still some debate as to who was behind the worst international terrorist attack ever, but the more we look into that fateful day, the more it starts to add up to being a false flag to justify the American government invading Iraq and Afghanistan.
There has been much speculation over how two Boeing 767’s can cut through tonnes of concrete and reinforced steel and glide into the WTC like a knife through warm butter, but ultimately this scientific miracle is only possibly if in-fact the planes themselves were not real.
So what were the WTC’s made of?
The perimeter walls of the WTC were comprised of a dense grids of vertical steel columns and horizontal spandrel plates. (Richard Roth, speaking on behalf of the architectural firm that designed the Towers, described each of the perimeter walls as essentially “a steel beam 209′ deep.”)
The perimeter wall structures were assembled from pre-fabricated units consisting of 3 column sections and 3 spandrel plate sections welded together. Adjacent units were bolted together: column sections were bolted to adjacent columns above and below, and spandrel plate sections were mated with adjacent sections on either side with numerous bolts… So basically solid steel with only 1′ 8″ x 8′ gaps for the windows..
This alone would have been enough to stop any plane from penetrating the buildings the way the videos suggest, however the exterior walls were not the biggest problem. In the case of Flight 175 that was rumoured to have hit the WTC South Tower between the 77th and 85th floors? take away the bottom (77th) and the Top (85th) and that still leaves 7 floor systems (bear with me!)
The Floor Systems for the WTC towers were a Bar Joist Truss System with concrete poured over pan. Each Truss was bolted and welded to the exterior box columns and spandrel plates with the other end bolted and welded to the core columns, each floor consisted of about an acre of concrete, that’s about 544 cubic yards x 4000 lbs x 7 floors or (15 million 232 thousand lbs of just concrete) backed up by the core columns that are anchored into bedrock!
A fully loaded Boeing 767 200ER has a take off weight of 395,000 lbs, the WTC South Tower had total weight of 1 million 500 thousand TONS and the Tower was anchored into bedrock! Let’s just take only the 7 floor systems alone (Just the Concrete mind you) and that had a combined weight of over 15 million lbs
Can we start to understand the slight issue I have with this?
Using Newtons Third Law, “Every reaction must have an equal and opposite reaction” , so therefore if you imagine the Twin Towers travelling at 500mph and crashing into a static plane, do you think the damage to the building would look the same? I don’t think so.
The planes would simply be pulverised, break up into small pieces on impact, and leave nothing more than a small scratch to the exterior of the buildings. Are you starting you question whether planes The Twin Towers now?
There are so many scientific impossibilities that took place on 9/11 which I shall explain below, but first lets take a look at the actual impact of the plane into the building in super slow motion, there are two things that defy the laws of psychics here, see if you can spot them;
Ok, most people see the first problem with this, the second I shall explain shortly.
As you watch the planes hit the twin towers from the nose, the rest of the plane stays completely still and unaffected by the impact as it easily “melts” into the building. Surely the planes speed would slow down a little bit due to the obvious resistance it was facing? No? Instead, it remains at a constant speed until it has completely be swallowed by the building.
How can the hollow wings or tail which are made of lightweight aluminium and fibreglass not break up on impact? The instant that the wings touched the steel, it would have exerted what is called “torsional torque” . The velocity of the end of wings would have been greatly reduced that they could never have sliced steel.
The planes on TV exhibited zero reaction force, Why? Because they were not real and therefore no Planes Hit The Twin Towers.
Extend your arms out and walk through a door way, what happens to your arms? That’s torsion. If you still have doubts, look at the damage caused to a fighter jet when it hit a small bird?
Ok, now for me comes the “smoking gun” footage that many people have failed to spot, and for me proves beyond doubt that these were holograms or that the images we all saw on 9/11 were simply a result of CGI;
Shocked? I was when I spotted this error, it appears as if the left wing of the plane goes behind the building behind the WTC and if you look closely enough, it goes in-front of the antenna on the top of the roof. There are several explanations for this each ultimately concluding fakery , but the one that has gained the most traction online seems to be that the video was composited from 3 layers – one layer with the UA 175 aircraft, a second layer with the foreground structures and a third layer with the WTC towers. The words that spring to mind here are ‘blue screen keying’, this would also explain why the video is full of edge effects, colour distortions, visual noise, ghosting effects, excessive compression artefacts, vertical streaks and many other visual aberrations.
The next piece of blatant fakery is from Fox New’s LIVE footage of the Twin Towers as the second plane crashed into the building. Watch the video below;
There are three things you should notice in the video. Firstly, the camera starts with a wide angle shot where no planes can be seen for miles surrounding the Twin Towers, the camera then zooms in on to a tight shot of the building and within seconds a plane appears and crashes into the tower? Based on the speed the plane was travelling, we should be able to see it approaching the WTC in the opening wide-shot.
Secondly, notice when the plane does hit the towers you can see the “nose”, which is made out of fibre glass, appears to come out the other side of the building? The live CGI editors of the footage seemed to notice the mistake and immediately blacked out the footage where I assume they could quickly apply a mask, before it reappears a second later showing the towers exploding into a fireball.
So just how did they get away with it? Surely with all the eye witnesses in New York that day, it should be irrefutable that planes hit the towers? But when we actually look at the testimonies of the witnesses on that day, many did not actually see a plane at all. On top of this, since the attacks, extremely credible witnesses including a former CIA pilot who’s sworn affidavit, states that;
“No planes flew into the Twin Towers as it would have been physically impossible”.
‘The alleged ‘controlled’ descent into New York on a relatively straight course by a novice pilot in unlikely in the extreme because of the difficulty of controlling heading, descent rate and descent speed within the parameters of ‘controlled’ flight.‘It takes a highly skilled pilot to interpret the “EFIS” (Electronic Flight Instrument Display) display, with which none of the hijacker pilots would have been familiar or received training on, and use his controls, including the ailerons, rudder, elevators, spoilers and throttles to effect, control and maintain a descent”
This video shows several contradictory witness statements on the day of 9/11 about the sighting of a plane, It makes for very interesting viewing;
It’s interesting to note that on 9/11, the military took control of what would be shown on the major TV stations (ABC, BBC, CBS, CNN, FOX and MSNBC) and blacked out all the local NYC TV stations. Even though at least five national TV stations would be airing “live” footage, the military only aired footage showing a plane flying into the South Tower on three stations (ABC, CBS, and MSNBC) and only showed a total of four different clips showing a plane (the CBS footage showed two different clips of a plane).
The only other cameraman that filmed crucial images of Ground Zero in New York after the Twin Towers collapsed was an American FEMA cameraman called Kurt Sonnefield who says September 11 was a lie is facing extradition from Argentina to the United States on alleged murder charges. Kurt Sonnenfeld, a man who was provided provisory refugee status seven years ago, is now wanted by the US government on murder charges which appears to be an excuse to silence him.
The fact is that genuinely flying two Boeing 747’s into the Twin Towers would be far too risky for the “perpe-traitors” as the cornerstone of the plan was to ensure that WTC 1, WTC 2 and Building 7 collapsed, so it would simply not be worth running the risk of either planes missing the target or the chance that the two planes didn’t crash exactly way they needed them to crash (i.e. penetrate all the way through so they blow up in the insides of both buildings), this is something the “conspirators” could not afford to chance.
Lastly, for conspiracists who believe the WTC was brought down with traditional explosives. Do you honestly think that crashing large planes loaded with fuel into two of the largest buildings in the world you’ve just covered with explosives for a controlled demolition would be a good idea? How would you know that the impact from the planes themselves would not prematurely explore any of the critically placed bombs, or worse case prevent the towers from falling at all?
Do you think the perps wanted the towers to fall over like trees into the neighbouring non-WTC skyscrapers? What if crashing a real plane into the North Tower caused it to collapse away from the WTC 7? Ultimately, they had to use the most viable option that would not only guarantee hitting their targets, but would also guarantee penetration into the buildings, and that was TV fakery.
We do not dispute that real lives were lost on 9/11, and our thoughts are with the families and I don’t wish to take anything away from that, but this has just been big lie from the start, the real criminals are sitting in a nice big White House right now counting the cash as they prepare for another illegal invasion in Syria in their quest for wold domination and Middle East resources. Hopefully the truth will come out one day, it will take a brave President to do it, but sadly by that time it’s likely that George Bush and his co-conspirators will be long dead and will have escaped facing trial for one of the biggest crimes in history.
If you still have doubts watch this video which goes into the CGI in much more detail.
Did planes hit the Twin Towers on 9/11? We don’t believe so — simply because it is impossible…